Conference Submission Guidelines
Authors must ensure their submissions are original, previously unpublished, and offer new insights. Submissions should accurately reflect the conducted work and its significance, with data presented honestly. Details must be thorough enough to allow replication. Ethical standards forbid fraudulent content.
Authors should make raw data available for review and public access when feasible, retaining it post-publication. Works must be original, properly citing or quoting others' work. Publications of similar research in multiple outlets are discouraged. Acknowledge all influential works.
Contributorship is limited to those significantly involved in the study. All contributors must be listed, with co-authors approving the final manuscript and its submission. Authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest and all funding sources.
Upon identifying errors in published work, authors must promptly correct or retract. Any hazards in the research must be clearly indicated.
Editors are committed to impartial review, respecting author confidentiality, and making decisions based on scholarly merit. Editorial processes, including peer review, are transparent.
Reviewers aid editorial decisions, providing objective feedback promptly and confidentially. They must avoid personal biases and conflicts of interest, recognizing relevant, uncredited work.
Plagiarism Policy
We employ anti-plagiarism tools to ensure content originality, rejecting manuscripts with high plagiarism levels. Plagiarism above 20% requires correction; levels above 60% lead to submission rejection and a three-year submission ban for authors. Repeated plagiarism or failure to revise as required results in submission rights suspension.